An empirical comparison of C,C++,Java,Perl,Python,Rexx,and by Prechelt L.

By Prechelt L.

Show description

Read Online or Download An empirical comparison of C,C++,Java,Perl,Python,Rexx,and Tcl for a search-string processing program PDF

Similar programming: programming languages books

Software development : case studies in Java

With a purpose to be capable of write stable software program, scholars might want to be accustomed to more than a few ideas; stable programming perform, adventure of challenge fixing, familiarity with improvement methodologies, and information of software program processes. This publication takes a brand new method of the educating of software program improvement.

Das siebte Buch: Objektorientierung mit C++

Der Werkzeugkasten der Methoden zur objektorientierten Softwarekonstruktion hat sich in der täglichen Praxis des Softwareingenieurs als Kollektion recht wirkungsvoller Hilfsmittel erwiesen. Diese Methoden helfen bei der Konstruktion korrekter, zuverlässiger und wiederverwendbarer software program. Sie begleiten die Konstruktion von der examine, additionally den ersten Ideen eines Programms, über den Entwurf bis hin zur Implementierung.

Hardware Verification with C++: A Practitioner’s Handbook

Written by way of verification engineers, Verification with C++: A Practitioner’s instruction manual is a four-part journey of ways to accomplish object-oriented suggestions. half I makes the case for C++, and indicates a customary verification method utilizing object-oriented programming (OOP). half II provides open-source C++ libraries that allow effective verification with C++ -- Teal, a C++ to Verilog interface, and Truss, a typical verification framework.

Extra resources for An empirical comparison of C,C++,Java,Perl,Python,Rexx,and Tcl for a search-string processing program

Example text

Software Engineering Economics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1981. [4] Jean-Pierre Briot, Rachid Guerraoui, and Klaus-Peter L¨ohr. Concurrency and distribution in objectoriented programming. ACM Computing Surveys, 30(3):291–329, September 1998. [5] Software Productivity Research Capers Jones. htm, 1996 (as of Feb. 2000). version 7. [6] Edsger W. Dijkstra. Go To statement considered harmful. Communications of the ACM, 1968. [7] Alireza Ebrahimi. Novice programmer errors: Language constructs and plan composition.

90 ?? 90 ?? 10 ?? 00 ?? 00 ?? 70 ?? 20 ?? 80 ?? 20 ?? 80 ?? 10 ?? 80 ?? 40 ?? 60 ?? 80 ?? 30 ?? 70 ?? 10 ?? 80 ?? 60 ?? 70 ?? 70 ?? 80 ?? 80 ?? 20 ?? 50 10-25% 10-25% 60-75% 25-40% 10-25% NA 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 40-60% 0-10% 25-40% 10-25% 0-10% 40-60% 0-10% 60-75% 10-25% 10-25% 10-25% 10-25% 10-25% 0-10% 10-25% 25-40% 10-25% 0-10% 0-10% 0-10% 40-60% 10-25% The reliability values of 98% and higher for z1000rel occur due to some very subtle I/O issues when the programs are executed in the test harness (where output is to a pipe rather than to a terminal).

A. Scanlan. Structured flowcharts outperform pseudocode: An experimental comparison. IEEE Software, 6:28–36, September 1989. 34 REFERENCES [19] Richard M. Shiffrin and Robert M. Nosofsky. Seven plus or minus two: A commentary on capacity limiations. Psychological Review, 101(2):357–361, 1994. E. P. Felix. A method of programming measurement and estimation. IBM Systems Journal, 16(1):54–73, 1977.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.91 of 5 – based on 43 votes